meriadeg

i saw this article earlier today when i was scouting around the sports media
[for the record, i'm not really sure when i picked up that habit,
especially considering my disdain for said sports media]
and i found it a really interesting read
not because of what it reports [conflict between jim delany and mark hollis]
but rather who this guy talks to in getting this story
if the people he cites are actually in the positions he claims,
[something i'm always skeptical of]
what kind of duality is jim delany cultivating?
granted, i've been a pretty big fan of him since i started following the big ten,
especially when it comes to selling the conference and establishing btn,
but this does provide some interesting questions

also, and i say this as a spartan fan,
i'm completely aware of the writer's obvious msu bias
especially when downplaying gholston's penalties,
along with elevating the dirtiness of tayler lewan
that being said, he does raise some intersting points
give it a read here

what say you, sports fans?